|
UST
Corrective Action Program Policies-New Hampshire
MAIN>
STATES > New Hampshire
|
1.0 STATE CONTACT INFORMATION |
|
| Last
Updated: 10/16/2001 |
| State
Name
New Hampshire
|
| Regulatory
Agency Name Department of Environmental Services
|
| Division
Name
Waste Management Division |
| Key
Contact Person(s)
|
| Name:
|
George Lombardo, P.E.
|
Name: |
N/A
|
| Title:
|
Administrator, ORCB
|
Title: |
|
| Telephone:
|
|
Telephone: |
|
| Email:
|
|
Email: |
N/A |
|
|
|
2.0 STATE UST CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM
INFORMATION |
|
| 2.1
Name of Corrective Action Program Site Remediation Programs |
| 2.2
Information Sources |
| |
2.2.1
Web Address: http://www.des.state.nh.us/orcb_hwrb.htm |
| |
2.2.2
Statute Citation (if applicable): N/A |
| |
2.2.3
Rule Citation (if applicable): N/A |
| |
2.2.4
Guidance Documents |
| |
|
2.2.4.1
Name: Risk Characterization Management Policy (RCMP) |
| |
|
2.2.4.2
Web address for download: http://www.des.state.nh.us/orcb/doclist/rcmp.pdf |
| |
|
2.2.4.3
Ordering Information:
|
| 2.3
|
When
was this corrective action program last revised (year)? 4/3/2001 |
| 2.4 |
Are
significant revisions planned in the next two years? No |
|
| 2.5 |
Is
the program based on ASTM RBCA framework (E-1739 or E-2081)?
Yes |
| 2.6 |
Program
Performance Records: Are data collected and analyzed by
the state to evaluate the
effectiveness of the state corrective action program? Yes
(If yes, identify program performance measures evaluated) |
| |
|
Case closure rate: Yes |
| |
|
Case backlog: Yes |
| |
|
Average site remediation cost: Yes |
| |
|
Risk
classification profile for active cases: Yes |
| |
|
Basis
for case closure: |
| |
|
Remediation portfolio risk reduction: |
| |
|
Other: N/A |
| 2.7 |
Applicable
Regulatory Programs: In addition to UST's, what other regulatory
areas are covered by this corrective action program? |
| |
|
RCRA: Yes |
| |
|
Superfund: Yes |
| |
|
Spills/Emergency
Response : Yes |
| |
|
Voluntary Cleanup: Yes |
| |
|
Brownfields: Yes |
| |
|
Other: N/A |
|
| |
| 3.1 |
Constituents
to be Analyzed: What constituents are required for analysis
at UST release sites under this corrective action program? |
| |
|
| |
| Constituent |
Soil |
GW |
| Benzene |
|
|
| Ethylbenzene |
|
|
| Toluene |
|
|
| Xylenes |
|
|
| MTBE |
|
|
| Lead |
|
|
| GRO |
|
|
| DRO |
|
|
| TPH |
|
|
| Other:
http://www.des.state.nh.us/orc
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
| Other:
N/A
|
|
|
| Other:
N/A
|
|
|
| Other:
N/A
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Notes:
GRO = Gas Range Organics, DRO = Diesel Range Organics, |
| |
TPH:
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons. |
| |
|
|
|
| 3.2 |
Site
Prioritization/Classification: Does the corrective action
program include a site classification system which is used to
rate each corrective action site regarding priority for corrective
action? Yes
|
|
|
3.2.1 |
If
yes, does the site classification
affect the corrective action requirements? No |
| |
3.2.2 |
If
yes, does the site classification
affect time frame for corrective action at the site?
No
|
| 3.3 |
Groundwater
Classification: Does the corrective action program include
a groundwater
classification system? No |
| |
3.3.1 |
If
yes, is the groundwater classification system based on regional
groundwater
characteristics (e.g. state groundwater quality/use
maps). Unknown |
| |
3.3.2 |
Is
the groundwater classification system based on site-specific
characteristics?
(If yes, indicate characteristics included in classification)?Unknown |
| |
|
Current groundwater use (e.g., proximity of wells, etc.):
|
| |
|
Water quality (e.g., total dissolved solids):
|
| |
|
Presence of other constituents (e.g., nitrate):
|
| |
|
Potential well yield:
|
| |
|
Hydraulic conductivity of groundwater-bearing units:
|
| |
|
Other:
N/A
|
| 3.4 |
Receptor
Survey : Is a receptor survey required as part of the
site assessment? Yes(If
yes, indicate types of receptors included in the survey) |
| |
|
Ecological habitats (e.g., wetlands, lakes, rivers, etc.): Yes
|
| |
|
Surface water bodies: Yes
|
| |
|
Land Use: Yes
|
| |
|
Water wells: Yes
|
| |
|
Underground utilities: Yes
|
| |
|
Basements: Yes
|
| |
|
Other: N/A |
| 3.5 |
Ecological
Risk : Is an ecological risk assessment required as part
of the site assessment or corrective action? No |
| |
3.5.1 |
If
yes, is there an ecological risk assessment guidance document?
|
| |
|
3.5.1.1
Web address: N/A |
| |
|
3.5.1.2
Document name: N/A |
| |
|
3.5.1.3
Ordering information:
|
| 3.6 |
Report
Forms : Does the corrective action program require use of
standardized report forms to report the results of the site
assessment? No |
| |
|
|
| |
| 4.1 |
Applicable
Exporsure Pathways: Are remediation standards based on defined
exposure pathways?
NF(If
yes, identify exposure pathways considered) |
| |
|
| |
|
Applicable
Exposure Pathway |
Pathway
Considered |
Pathway
Screening
Allowed |
|
Soil |
|
|
Soil
Direct Contact (Inhalation,
Ingestion, and/or Dermal Contact) |
NF
|
NF |
| Soil
to Groundwater |
NF
|
NF
|
| Soil
to Outdoor Air |
NF
|
NF
|
| Soil
to Indoor Air |
NF
|
NF
|
| Groundwater
|
| Groundwater
Ingestion |
NF
|
NF |
| Groundwater
to Outdoor Air |
NF
|
NF
|
| Groundwater
to Indoor Air |
NF
|
NF |
Groundwater
to
Surface Water |
NF
|
NF
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
4.1.1 |
Does
the corrective action program allow pathway screening (a site-specific
demonstration that an exposure pathway is incomplete)?
NF |
| |
|
|
|
| 4.2 |
Numerical
Concentration Limits: Numerical concentration limits are determined
based on which ofthe following factors (check all that apply)? |
| |
|
Background Concentration: NF
Analytical detection limits: NF
Regulatory limit (e.g., MCL): NF
Risk-based calculation: NF |
| |
4.2.1 |
For
a groundwater classified as a drinking water resource: |
| |
|
MCL does not apply: NF |
| |
|
MCL always applies, if available for the COC: NF
|
| |
|
Use lesser of MCL or site-specific value: NF |
| |
|
Use greater of MCL or site-specific valueNF |
| |
4.2.2 |
Concentration
limits may change based on which of the following factors (check
all that apply)? |
| |
|
Land use: NF |
| |
|
Groundwater classification: NF |
| |
|
Assessment Tier: NF
|
| |
|
Physical controls: NF |
| |
|
Institutional controls: NF |
| 4.3 |
Development
of Site-Specific Concentration Limits: Does the corrective
action program allow the applicant to develop site-specific
soil and groundwater concentration limits for use in site remediation?
NF
|
| |
4.3.1 |
If
yes, how many evaluation tiers
are included in the development of
site-specific concentration limits? NF |
| 4.4 |
Generic
Screening Limits: For a Tier 1 evaluation or equivalent
generic screening assessment, provide concentration limits for
the following conditions: |
| |
|
Residential |
Commercial |
|
Drinking
Water |
Non-Drinking
Water |
Non-Drinking
Water |
| Benzene |
| GW:
Groundwater
Ingestion |
mg/l |
mg/l |
mg/l |
| Soil:
Soil to GW |
mg/kg |
mg/kg |
mg/kg |
| Soil:
Direct
Contact |
mg/kg |
mg/kg |
| MTBE |
| GW:
Groundwater
Ingestion |
mg/l |
mg/l |
mg/l |
| Soil:
Soil to GW |
mg/kg |
mg/kg |
mg/kg |
| Soil:
Direct
Contact |
mg/kg |
mg/kg |
|
| |
|
| 4.5 |
Applicable
Target Risk Limits: Are the generic concentration limits (i.e.
Tier 1) used in this program based on target risk limits? NF(If
yes, specify applicable target risk below:) |
| |
4.5.1 |
Carcinogens |
| |
|
4.5.1.1 Individual constituents: NF
|
| |
|
4.5.1.2 Cumulative effects (multiple constituents):
NF
|
| |
4.5.2 |
Non-Carcinogens |
| |
|
.4.5.2.1
Individual constituents: NF |
| |
|
4.5.2.2 Cumulative effects (multiple constituents): NF |
| |
4.5.3 |
Do risk limits vary by assessment tier? NF |
|
| |
| 5.1 |
Groundwater
Remedy: Does the selected groundwater remedy always have
to prevent short-term groundwater plume growth? NF |
| 5.2 |
NAPL
Remediation Requirements: What quantity of NAPL observed
in observation will triggers NAPL
investigation/response action?NF |
| |
5.2.1 |
Is
NAPL removal to extent practicable required in all cases? |
|
| |
|
NF
|
|
| |
5.2.2 |
If
extent of NAPL remediation depends on risk factors, identify
applicable factors triggering need for NAPL response: |
| |
|
NAPL discharge to ground surface or SW: NF |
| |
|
Explosive vapor condition in subsurface utility or other structure:
NF
|
| |
|
NAPL plume expanding in area: NF
|
| |
|
NAPL contributing to expansion of dissolved plume: NF
|
| |
|
Site-specific risk evaluation indicates need for NAPL response:
NF
|
| 5.3 |
Use
of Monitored Natural Attenuation: Is monitored natural attenuation
(MNA) an acceptable remedy for management of affected
groundwater, if effective? NF |
| |
5.3.1 |
Is
state guidance available for implementation of monitored natural
attenuation remedies? NF |
| |
|
5.3.1.1 Web address: |
| |
|
5.3.1.2 Guidance document name: |
| |
|
5.3.1.3 Ordering information:
|
| |
5.3.2 |
Is
active removal of the "source area" (e.g., residual,
non-mobile NAPL ) always required when monitored natural attenuation
is used as a groundwater remedy? NF
|
| 5.4 |
Use
of Engineering Controls:
Are engineering controls acceptable remedies, if effective?
NF |
| |
|
Pavement for containment of affected soils: NF |
| |
|
Barrier wall or cutoff trench for control of GW: NF |
|
| |
|
Pump and treat for hydraulic containment: NF |
|
| |
|
Other: |
| 5.5 |
Use
of Institutional Controls:
Are institutional controls (e.g., land use restrictions, groundwater
use restrictions) allowed or required for some remedies? NF(If
yes, identify acceptable institutional control methods) |
| |
|
Deed notice: NF |
|
| |
|
Deed restriction: NF |
|
| |
|
Restrictive covenant or other contract with land owner: NF |
|
| |
|
Listing in state registry of affected properties: NF |
|
| |
|
Agreed order or consent decree: NF |
|
| |
|
Other: |
| |
|
|
|
|
6.0 CASE
CLOSURE CRITERIA |
|
| 6.1 |
Groundwater
Compliance Monitoring |
| |
6.1.1 |
How
many groundwater sampling events are required to demonstrate
compliance with groundwater remediation standards following
active remediation?:NF |
| |
|
|
|
| |
6.1.2 |
How
many groundwater sampling events are required to demonstrate
compliance with groundwater remediation standards following
monitored natural attenuation ?:NF |
| |
|
|
|
| |
6.1.3 |
What
is the minimum time between groundwater sampling events?:NF |
| |
|
|
|
The
UST Corrective Action State Policy Database is a continual work
in progress, based on survey responses that are submitted by state
policy regulators.
While we have attempted to ensure that the information is updated
on a timely basis,
GSI Environmental Inc., make no assurance as to the accuracy
of the data provided by the survey respondants.
We advise that you confirm policy information with the state regulatory
agency. If you find that there is an error in the information provided
on this site, please contact the site managers at inquiries@gsi-net.com
|
|