MONITORED
NATURAL ATTENUATION
Is monitored natural attenuation (MNA) an acceptable
remedy for management of affected groundwater, if effective
| The survey question was: |
|
Is monitored
natural attenuation (MNA) an acceptable remedy for management
of affected groundwater, if effective Is state guidance available for implementation of monitored natural attenuation remedies (provide acquisition information) Yes No Unknown Is active
removal or treatment of the "source area" (e.g. residual,
non-mobile NAPL) always required when monitored natural attenuation
is used as a groundwater remedy? |
| The responses to this question are summarized below |
|
Across the
United States, the response was as follows:  
|
 |
Site Development by GSI Environmental Inc. of Houston, TX |
|
The
UST Corrective Action State Policy Database is a continual work
in progress, based on survey responses that are submitted by state
policy regulators.
While we have attempted to ensure that the information is updated
on a timely basis,
GSI Environmental Inc., make no assurance as to the accuracy
of the data provided by the survey respondants.
We advise that you confirm policy information with the state regulatory
agency. If you find that there is an error in the information provided
on this site, please contact the site managers at inquiries@gsi-net.com
|